Review



hdr repair template plasmids  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc hdr repair template plasmids
    Hdr Repair Template Plasmids, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hdr repair template plasmids/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hdr repair template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids
    Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
    Ext1 Homology Directed Repair Hdr Template Plasmids, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ext1 homology directed repair hdr template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology repair hdr template plasmids
    Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
    Repair Hdr Template Plasmids, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/repair hdr template plasmids/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    repair hdr template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Addgene inc hdr repair template plasmids
    Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
    Hdr Repair Template Plasmids, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hdr repair template plasmids/product/Addgene inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hdr repair template plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology plasmids providing templates for homology-directed repair sc-403281-hdr
    Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of <t>EXT1</t> contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).
    Plasmids Providing Templates For Homology Directed Repair Sc 403281 Hdr, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/plasmids providing templates for homology-directed repair sc-403281-hdr/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    plasmids providing templates for homology-directed repair sc-403281-hdr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of EXT1 contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).

    Journal: Nature communications

    Article Title: The structure of EXTL3 helps to explain the different roles of bi-domain exostosins in heparan sulfate synthesis.

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31048-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 The level of GlcAT-II activity in EXTL3ΔN preparations exhibits substantial dependence on the level of EXT1 contamination. EXTL3ΔN was prepared from the culture medium of regular EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells (EXTL3ΔN), EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a non-specific CRISPR- Cas9 control construct (EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol), or EXTL3ΔN-expressing cells transfected with a CRISPR-Cas9 construct targeting EXT1 (EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1). a The relative abundance of EXTL3(ΔN), EXT1, and EXT2 in the three different preparations was determined by mass spectrometry/label-free quantification. The lower limit of detection corresponds to approximately 106 arbitrary units. For numerical values, as well as the top ten most abundant proteins, see Supplementary Table 3. Each dataset was obtained from a single biological replicate. b–e Comparison of GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II activities of EXTL3ΔN, EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol, and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 preparation, visualised by PACE. For both activities, five independent assays were carried out using the same biological enzyme preparation (i.e. n = 5 technical replicates for each treatment) to account for potential technical variability. b, d GlcNAcT-II activity: DP8 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc, MnCl2, and MgCl2. c, e GlcAT-II activity: DP9 acceptor was treated with enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcA, MnCl2, and MgCl2. Reactions were then split in two; each half was terminated after 15 or 60 min, respectively. b, c Representative PACE gels for GlcNAcT-II and GlcAT-II 60 min time points, respectively. d, e Percentage substrate conversion at the two different time points was determined by densitometry. Dots represent individual measurements, crosses represent group means, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Statistics: one-way ANOVA (two-tailed) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD); NS no significant difference * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. GlcNAcT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 0.75, p = 0.49 (15 min); F2,12 = 2.23, p = 0.15 (60 min). GlcAT-II ANOVA: F2,12 = 21.09, p = 1.18 × 10−4 (15 min); F2,12 = 36.2, p = 8.29 × 10−6 (60 min). GlcAT-II Tukey’s HSD between EXTL3ΔN (1), EXTL3ΔN CRISPRcontrol (2), and EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 (3): p = 0.0149 (1~2), p = 0.0213 (1~3), p = 8.15 × 10−4 (2~3) (15 min); p = 0.0479 (1~2), p = 0.00187 (1~3), p = 5.6 × 10−6 (2~3) (60 min).

    Article Snippet: The EXTL3ΔN CRISPREXT1 cells were then further transfected with a set of EXT1 homology-directed repair (HDR) template plasmids (EXT1 HDR Plasmid (h), sc-404635-HDR; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for permanent expression according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Transfection, CRISPR, Control, Construct, Mass Spectrometry, Comparison, Two Tailed Test